I have just tried to post this comment to the Truthout dialog ... but it may well have been blocked. I hope not.
President Obama has done more to help get the US back on track than his predecessors. Sadly, few people in the USA appreciate just how far the country was off track when Obama took over the responsibilities of being President.
The Republican opposition has been extremely "unhelpful" to the Obama Presidency, and, in my view, they should be held accountable for much of the present weakness of the US economy. Let us not forget, it was the Bush/Cheney and Republican leadership, together with the help of super-greedy US oligarchs that got the US into a financial crisis and the fact that the world has emerged from this mess so quickly is good. Frankly, with a more supportive Congress, the President would have been able to do much more and take a much more pro-active stance with respect to jobs ... but Republicans ... and corporate decision makers and bankers ... do not seem to appreciate that, more than anything else, it is jobs that are fundamental to sustainable profit.
In my view, the US economy will not do well under Republican leadership. The "voodoo" economics (so named by George Bush senior in the 1980 Presidential campaign) of the Republicans has drained the US economy of its wealth while making some few individuals and corporate entities fabulously wealthy. This is not a good economic model for the 21st Century ... it harks back to the era of Robber Barons in the 19th century!
But nor will the US do well under much of the Progressive agenda ... there is no future in a society where little work results in big entitlements. On the other hand there is a huge need for investment in physical infrastructure and in human capital but in ways that do not require massive government based subsidy and welfare.
The US has a future ... but only if the dialog about important issues is well informed and the outcomes based on factual analysis and not merely on simplistic ideology. I am an advocate for value accounting as well as profit accounting ... putting both of these into the computation that goes in deciding where resources are deployed!
This is the text of the Truthout post. Its URL is:
An Honest Look at Obama's First Year
Sunday 08 August 2010
by: David Swanson, t r u t h o u t | Book Review
President Barack Obama. (Photo: David Katz/Obama for America)
Most commentary on President Barack Obama either beats him up unfairly because he's not a Republican or cuts him extra slack because he's not a Republican. If, in the privacy of your own home, you want to pause and review the main events of the first year or more of this presidency, as recorded by someone who obviously doesn't care about partisan boosting, I recommend Paul Street's new book "The Empire's New Clothes: Barack Obama in the Real World of Power."
This is an excellent detailed analysis from a progressive writer willing to note the good, the bad, and the ugly, and to admit when the bad and the ugly seem to be dominating the scene. It's early, of course, for an overview of this presidency. And it's still early for a lot of potential readers to be able to handle the truth. But this book lays out the highlights and lowlights in a way that should advance readers' understanding.
Paul Street looks first at the bankster bailouts, the auto bailout, the corporatist schools policies (which, through a veto threat, may have played a role in the Senate's decision on Thursday night to reject a war spending bill that recklessly included funding for teachers of non-murderous skills). Street looks at the approach of the Obama administration to the environment, including mountaintop removal, offshore drilling, nuclear power, crap and trade, and a performance in Copenhagen that might be characterized as sabotaging a planetary rescue attempt. Street acknowledges improvements over Bush-Cheney, but moves on to areas where Obama is worsening their misdeeds.
Chapter Two focuses on war and recounts how Obama's support in the Democratic presidential primaries grew predominantly out of his imaginary opposition to war, especially the Iraq War, to which he's now sending more mercenaries. The Iraqi people had been promised a public vote on the Bush-Maliki deal permitting occupation until the end of 2011. Obama successfully pressured the Iraqi government to deny its people that vote, knowing they would vote the treaty down. Street also discusses Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Israel, and South America (where US ships recently headed). The one thing all these places have in common: Obama's been bad for them.
Chapter Three examines in a way that has been badly needed the tragicomic saga of corporate health insurance reform. Chapter Four looks at race. And Chapter Five delves into more areas in which Obama has adopted and expanded upon Bush's policies (or, in many cases, what we used to call "crimes"). Street reviews the PATRIOT Act, habeas corpus, spying, torture, and the incredible lengths to which Obama has gone in his crusade to fully protect Bush, Cheney, and their co-conspirators, an effort that has included making threats to England should it be so uncouth as to reveal any evidence of wrongdoing.
Chapter Six is called "We Were Warned," and catalogues the many ways in which we already knew that Obama would not be, or at least was not promising to be, what so many fantasized he might. But knowing that you shouldn't be disappointed doesn't always undisappoint you. What's needed are solutions, and Street's book is weaker in that area. He's pretty quiet on the need to shift power away from presidents, as well as the need to eliminate the forces controlling presidents. Street seems to accept that presidents simply have unlimited power, and devotes his investigation to exposing the quality of Obama's use and abuse of that power.
However, there is this nugget of wise advice in the chapter on health insurance reform:
"Millions of Americans have been led to misunderstand meaningful democratic politics. Many have been conditioned to see making strictly limited choices in the narrow-spectrum, mass-marketed, corporate-crafted election spectacles the power elite stages for them every four years as the only politics that matters. Real issues, public policy, and the need for regular ongoing popular movements and pressure at the day-to-day grassroots level get lost in the fog induced by hypnotic, colored-lights election dramas, focused on the competing, expertly marketed images of crafty politicians who understand very well their subordination to Edward Herman and David Peterson's 'unelected dictatorship of money.'"
In other words, expect more from day-to-day agitation and less from elections. Good advice. The entire book implies another bit of wisdom as well: Be loyal to peace, justice, the social good, but not to politicians or their parties. A caller to a radio show I was on this week urged me not to press elected officials to end wars if they were Democrats. Didn't I realize that the Teabaggers were "the real enemy"? But I don't view pressuring representatives to represent us as making them into enemies. And it cannot be a foregone conclusion that persuading the less awful of two candidates to take a stand for something popular is going to hurt them in their next election. It just might help.
Street does end his book with a chapter called "Postscript: The Sorry Surrender of the So-Called Radical Left." This lamentation implies what is needed by bewailing its absence. In an earlier chapter, Street hints at what might be changing for the better:
"By the end of 2009, President Barack Obama seemed to be facing something of a mini-rebellion in the nation's progressive ranks, much of which had gone to remarkable, sometime even absurd, lengths to support and defend him and his administration against any and all critics, right and left."
However, if that became a serious rebellion in 2009 I've missed it. And I've suspected it was almost here in mid-2010, without any solid evidence. Maybe we all just tend to assume that the world is about to come to its senses, whether it is or not.
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.